WikiProjects starting to use pageview stats in article assessment

While bopping around en.wp I noticed Wikipedia:WikiProject Mathematics/Wikipedia 1.0/Frequently viewed/List.

WikiProject Mathematics use the page view stats and a bot to mark article talk pages of their most popular pages.

WikiProject Aviation has started putting together an annotated list, with the monthly and daily views and also the article’s current assessment rating. That kind of table is a great motivator — their fourth most viewed article during June is only “Start” class.

WikiProject Pharmacology made what looks like a one-off report of their articles that get more than 80,000 pageviews per month (there are 43), annotated with GA/FA icons.

WikiProject Human Genetic History just put together a table for February 2008. It’s not clear what if anything they intended to do with it.

Sage Ross wrote in March about how biographies are much more popular than “history of” articles:

For historians who want to reach a broad audience through Wikipedia, putting historical context into biographies and topics of contemporary interest is probably more effective than writing concept-, artifact- or event-based historical articles.

This is great. It would be even better if there was some kind of toolserver thing that could generate reports for WikiProjects (or maybe specific templates/categories). We have the dots… but we don’t connect them very well.

Are there any other WikiProjects using the pageview stats in this way?

03 August, 2008 • ,


Elsewhere on the web...

Commenting is closed for this article.

list of all posts, ever

find articles by tag

monthly archive

most popular articles

  1. [guest] Rethinking the Top Ten
  2. An alternative term for "User-generated content"
  3. How to use Gmail to manage high-traffic mailing lists
  4. NLA Innovative Ideas Forum audio/video now available
  5. Write API enabled on Wikimedia sites!
  6. Free as in Freedom miniconf recap + slides
  7. Templatology, an essay
  8. Top 10 software extensions Wikimedia Commons needs in 2008
  9. Is mass collaboration all it's cracked up to be?
  10. GLAM-WIKI, day one

(from the last 30 days)