Video from AussieChix microconf - Wikipedia & the education system

I had a great, although tiring, day yesterday: I went to the AussieChix microconf event. AussieChix is the Australian arm of LinuxChix. The “microconf” was a one-day event simultaneously happening in Melbourne and Sydney, with speakers in both cities, connected via videoconferencing. Giant thanks to Mary and Alice for organising it, and Google Australia and their wonderful employees for donating their space, bandwidth and time to enable us to have this event.

I first got involved with LinuxChix not long after WikiChix was founded, I suppose. I was curious about this group that we were modelling on, and I was probably feeling more confident about exploring Linux. I really can’t speak highly enough about the Australian LinuxChix. They are some amazing women. Every single one of them is just doing really cool stuff. Whether they are quiet or boisterous, they are all really strong and each have their own way of not taking shit from other people. It’s like women-company nirvana for me. And that we all just utterly geek out is the icing on the cake. :)

Anyway enough raving. I gave a ~15 minute talk on “Wikipedia & the education system”. It’s not anything super polished, just some thoughts I have been having since I attended ACEC, the computers in education conference.

Talk: Wikipedia & the education system from Brianna Laugher on Vimeo.

Skimmable format:

26 October, 2008 • , , ,



Interesting post. Thanks.

I am the Director of Educational Technology for a fairly large school district in Alaska.

We are using MediaWiki (the Wikipedia software) as a tool for both collaborative curriculum development, and student publishing of various types of digital work products.

It is my view that with proper oversight and guidance, collaborative knowledge construction for an authentic audience could be an incredible hook to engage low socioeconomic status,
non-traditionally motivated students in academic tasks. Wikis offer the most promising way of making that happen.

Our district is talking with the Palo Alto Research Center (PARC) about how to use their excellent visualization tools to help teachers track and assess student contributions to internally held wiki installations.

The have a very promising approach up and working with the Wikipedia itself, and we plan to link our internal “writing process approach” with MediaWiki to include Wikipedia as a higher editing and publishing output for academic credit if the contributions are “lasting”.

The PARC tool shows visually the frequence, the relative weight and the lasting nature of any users contributions.

Check it out by adding the WP article name to this URL:

This really offers some promise for educators, and I am working on a blog post about it as we speak.

Thanks for the post and the video.

John Concilus –

John Concilus · 27. October 2008, 04:47


Hi John, thanks for your comment.

Yes, the PARC Dashboard is something I forgot to mention in the past. I will have to remember it for next time. I’m glad to hear you’ve had success with MediaWiki. Please drop me a line and let me know if some good results come out of your projects.

pfctdayelise · 1. November 2008, 16:17

Elsewhere on the web...

Commenting is closed for this article.

list of all posts, ever

find articles by tag

monthly archive

most popular articles

  1. [guest] Rethinking the Top Ten
  2. An alternative term for "User-generated content"
  3. How to use Gmail to manage high-traffic mailing lists
  4. NLA Innovative Ideas Forum audio/video now available
  5. Write API enabled on Wikimedia sites!
  6. Free as in Freedom miniconf recap + slides
  7. Templatology, an essay
  8. Top 10 software extensions Wikimedia Commons needs in 2008
  9. Is mass collaboration all it's cracked up to be?
  10. GLAM-WIKI, day one

(from the last 30 days)