Copyvios flow in, copyvios flow out


© Mila Zinkova, CC-BY-SA-2.5

Much of the work at Wikimedia Commons revolves around identifying and removing copyright violations. So it is unusual to find that someone copyio’ed our content rather than the other way round.

Mbz1’s story is here:

Few days ago I got e-mail from London. The guy e-mailed me that he saw my image of a puffer fish at the posters advertising Kleenex in London tube. I asked him, if he could take an image of this poster and he was kind enough to do it for me. He e-mailed the image of the poster to me. There was my fish at this poster all right. I felt “all puffed up” and I e-mailed to Kleenex for the explanations. Today they called me. They admitted they took my image from Wikipedia and they told me that the artist, who did it, was told that Wikipedia is the place to get free images. [..] They apologized, they are going to pay me 700 Pound sterlings, send me the copy of the poster and a letter with the admission they violated my copy rights. My main condition was that I did not want them to punish the artist, who I sure, has not had a bad intention and took my image by mistake.

LOL. I’m pretty sure taking the time to read the license would have been cheaper than £700.

26 January, 2008 • ,

Comment

Elsewhere on the web...

Commenting is closed for this article.

list of all posts, ever

find articles by tag

monthly archive

most popular articles

  1. Top 10 software extensions Wikimedia Commons needs in 2008
  2. Closing a door
  3. Free MediaWiki hosting offered by Dreamhost Apps
  4. Is mass collaboration all it's cracked up to be?
  5. A(nother) happy Wikimania
  6. Taking a WikiExpedition
  7. How to use Gmail to manage high-traffic mailing lists
  8. Media handling on Wikimedia: Preview the future! (part 1)
  9. A FLOSS Manual: How to contribute to Wikimedia Commons
  10. Wikipedia, the deeply conservative and traditional encyclopedia

(from the last 30 days)